Fantasy is one of my most favorite genres. While it can often lead people into idealism and romantic notions of what knighthood would be, and while it quite commonly depicts good and evil as simple black and white dichotomies, and while it is usually just escapism, it can also express limitless philosophy. And it is entertaining the entire time it is doing it. It is a very open-ended genre.
And there isn't much fantasy for the movie-going public. Even less for video-gamers. For good fantasy, one almost always has to turn to books.
And Stardust doesn't do a whole lot about this. Because Stardust isn't really a "fantasy" in the common way. It is a Fairy Tale. Which is a type of fantasy but one that will never compete with the Lord of the Rings.
It's better than that; it competes with The Hobbit.
It shouldn't be too surprising for most people what happens in the overall plot. What is interesting and enjoyably about Stardust is the turns it makes on this adventure. They are always entertaining, usually amusing, sometimes preposterous, but never dull or boring. There are a few scenes that are a little flimsy and unthoughtful, but they are quickly overshadowed by the overall enjoyability of this very "Fine Fairy Tale". I'd love to give this movie the rating of a "Fine Faery Tale", in the Tolkienian sense, but it doesn't quite have that charm to me. Gaiman's land of "Fairy" is not quite the same as Tolkien's "Faery". Besides, Gaiman chose the word Fairy himself.
For those who have read the book, Stardust the movie doesn't even try to remain true. Or so I hear. I haven't read it yet. For many this will be a very big problem. However, the movie stands on its own. It isn't a companion to the books, a la the Harry Potter movies, or some inexpert abridgment, a la Watership Down. The problems with the movie are less distracting than they are in Inkheart.
And, of course, good music makes a good movie.
I was very impressed with this movie. Even more so than I expected to be. If you like fantasy, go see it; if you like a good fairy tale, go see it; if you loved the book and didn't want to see any changes, you probably shouldn't.
Analysis (spoilers to follow):
Why did the prince just have to stay at the fake in? More importantly, why in the hell did the witch Lamia get up and admit them? Why?
It's the biggest detraction from this otherwise great movie.
A little light thought in a world of heavy problems. I hope it is an entertaining as it is enlightening and reinforcing.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Good Chapters:
-
I like design. And systems. Creating controlling systems. When I was younger, I imagined video-game controllers because that is what I did....
-
Once upon a time, on the West coast of Vancouver Island, long before it was called Vancouver Island, the Nuu-Chah-Nulth people fished the P...
-
The Paradigm Phone numbers are a very old system, and should be applauded for lasting as long as they have. They are wonderful things, be...
-
The Celtic people live in our culture and minds very romantically. I see them as big, brave, red-bearded folk who could eat and drink and p...
-
In Scott Tipton's last email, he is very critical of the Dodd-Frank act as a reform on the financial industry in favor of a "Finan...
-
I find it almost hard to believe that people are surprised Windows 8 has a small market share. How old is Windows 7? I find that in mos...
-
I was happy to see a call to defend our natural resources for Colorado citizens in Scott Tipton's last email. I am very worried that th...
-
The movie Rango is quite good, despite the fact that it is entirely peopled (with the exceptions of Rango himself) of very standard, cliche...
-
Travel to Thailand: Beautiful Jungles and Beautiful Animals and opportunities to protect them "Natural Behav...
-
A little while ago, I read yet another off hand comment about how lazy everyone nowadays is. Condemning the Occupy Wall Street movement as ...
No comments:
Post a Comment