This is a very unique movie. If you are a dialog driven individual, you should be warned that there ain't much in here. The movie is entirely crafted from visual style, sounds, and music. It becomes quite the "artistic" film. Like the ballet, but I can understand animation more than dance: I'm more familiar with it. Or like the beginning of Wall-E, but not quite so magnificent (however, Triplets sustains better than Wall-E, which I only found so magnificent for the first part).
The advantage of this style is that it creates a film that can really be understood by any language group because "language" isn't important. There is no need for subtitles. But it does require an attention of a different sort than usual and it is a different culture (by a little) than what the average American knows. If you aren't ready for that, then this may not be the movie for you. It is undeniable that the film is "good". But it is very particular and probably could not be enjoyed (at all) by many people. But for those who are adventurous and looking for something new and different, it is a good lead. The movie is very, very well polished, that much is clear.
I kinda like the visual style. It is reminiscent of cartoons such as old Popeye in how they moved, but there was much more detail and the same level of exaggeration in what everyone looked like. Its like one of those old "find things" books in how much is going on in the background (and the foreground) and I doubt anyone sees it all the first four times they watch the movie. I've only seen it once, so I feel like I've barely seen the surface.
The tone of the movie is pretty melancholy, even if it is filled with visual jokes. The movie makes me feel sad so that, when the jokes come, I'm not really in the mood to laugh. But if your sense of humor is really cynical and dry, the movie is probably better to you.
It was an interesting adventure, and I recommend it to those who are ready for that.
Update:
I watched Triplets of Belleville again, and found it to be very re-watchable. I also watched it with a cycling fanatic who was amazed at the brilliant level of detail. Whoever made this movie knows as much about biking as they do about animating.
This is a very detailed and finely tuned film. I still find it to be "Artistic" but in a very entertaining way. If you can get past the lack of dialog, it is a very good movie.
However,
The ending is almost too laughable. Too unreal for a movie with so much background detail.
A little light thought in a world of heavy problems. I hope it is an entertaining as it is enlightening and reinforcing.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Good Chapters:
-
I like design. And systems. Creating controlling systems. When I was younger, I imagined video-game controllers because that is what I did....
-
Once upon a time, on the West coast of Vancouver Island, long before it was called Vancouver Island, the Nuu-Chah-Nulth people fished the P...
-
The Paradigm Phone numbers are a very old system, and should be applauded for lasting as long as they have. They are wonderful things, be...
-
The Celtic people live in our culture and minds very romantically. I see them as big, brave, red-bearded folk who could eat and drink and p...
-
In Scott Tipton's last email, he is very critical of the Dodd-Frank act as a reform on the financial industry in favor of a "Finan...
-
I find it almost hard to believe that people are surprised Windows 8 has a small market share. How old is Windows 7? I find that in mos...
-
I was happy to see a call to defend our natural resources for Colorado citizens in Scott Tipton's last email. I am very worried that th...
-
The movie Rango is quite good, despite the fact that it is entirely peopled (with the exceptions of Rango himself) of very standard, cliche...
-
Travel to Thailand: Beautiful Jungles and Beautiful Animals and opportunities to protect them "Natural Behav...
-
A little while ago, I read yet another off hand comment about how lazy everyone nowadays is. Condemning the Occupy Wall Street movement as ...
No comments:
Post a Comment